On the Question of Authorship in Large Language Models (LLMs)
The adoption of pre-trained large language models (LLMs), like ChatGPT, across an increasingly diverse range of tasks
and domains poses significant challenges for authorial attribution and other basic knowledge organization practices. This
paper examines the theoretical and practical issues introduced by LLMs and describes how their use erodes the supposedly
firm boundaries separating specific works and creators. Building upon the author-as-node framework proposed by Soos
and Leazer (2020), we compare works created with and without the use of LLMs; ultimately, we argue that the issues
associated with these novel tools are indicative of preexisting limitations within standard entity-relationship models. As the
growing popularity of generative AI raises concerns about plagiarism, academic integrity, and intellectual property, we
encourage a reevaluation of reductive work/creator associations and advocate for the adoption of a more expansive
approach to authorship.
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).