DATING THE BRONZE AGE OF SOUTHEAST ASIA. WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Authors

  • Charles Franklin Higham University of Otago
  • Thomas Franklin Higham Oxford University
  • Katerina Douka Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7152/jipa.v43i0.15411

Abstract

We have dated human bone, freshwater shell, charcoal and rice grains from key sites in mainland Southeast Asia in order to establish the chronological scaffolding for later prehistory (ca 2500 BC-AD 500). In a recent report on the metal remains from the site of Ban Chiang, however, this chronology has been challenged. Here, we respond to these claims and show that they are unfounded and misleading. We maintain the integrity of the Bayesian-modelled radiocarbon results that identify the arrival of the first rice and millet farmers in mainland Southeast Asia towards the end of the 3rd millennium BC, with the first evidence for the casting of bronze by about 1100 BC. Social change that followed the establishment of metallurgy was rapid and profound. 

Author Biographies

Charles Franklin Higham, University of Otago

Professor

Department of Anthropology

Thomas Franklin Higham, Oxford University

Research Lab for Archaeology and the History of Art

Katerina Douka, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History,

Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History,

Jena

Downloads

Published

2020-01-04

Issue

Section

Articles